I’ve never liked or trusted angels. I also found them wholly
implausible. Their physiology made no sense. Where were the muscles to flap
those bloody great wings on their backs? As with a bunch of other biblical
weirdness like the Nephilim (who I exploited at length in the Renquist Quartet)
I decided they were probably an alien lifeform deliberately confusing
primitive sheep-herding humans. Now, however, we have a quasi-scientific study that
they might be damn great humanoid insects.
“Angels are most commonly represented as winged humanoids,
with two arms, occasionally two feet suggesting the presence of legs, and two
wings (often feathered). This six-limbed state is not a vertebrate structure,
as any look at basic vertebrate anatomy quickly reveals. The capacity for
flight has arisen in three vertebrate lineages — volant flight in pterosaurs
[Reptilia], birds [Aves], and bats [Mammalia]; gliding flight in a range of
lizards, snakes, fish and — and in NONE of those has it resulted in the
addition of limbs. All three groups have wings derived from some element of the
forelimbs. The forelimbs are dedicated to flight functions at the expense of
some typical uses in the general vertebrate plan, but are never supplemented by
additional limbs. Angels therefore are not vertebrates or derived from
vertebrate stock. The implications of this are profound. The only winged
invertebrates are in the Class Insecta insects [Insecta]. Insects constitute
the largest taxon on earth (or, apparently, anywhere else). Insects are
six-legged (hexapodal) and may have 1-2 pairs of wings,
for a total of 8-10 “limbs.” Angels thus represent a highly derived
insect group with secondary loss of limbs, derived from a hexapodal ancestry.”
Click here for the whole story
Click here for The Imperialites (Thanks Richard)
The secret word is Cherub
1 comment:
Oi geezer a quick word in ur 'shell-like'..if ya bite off the hand that feeds ya,I will have trouble with Victor's belief in the 'NOSTFERATU', remember The Noddy Song..??
Post a Comment