Thursday, September 17, 2009

THE WOLVES OF CHERNOBYL


I have serious reservations about some of the ideas presented in this story, but I’m posting it because I find it totally fascinating and also extremely poignant…

“We walked out into a wasteland, grey and desolate. The buildings had deteriorated, windows had been smashed. Trees and weeds had grown over everything: it was a ghost town." It reads like a passage from a post-apocalyptic novel, such as Cormac McCarthy's The Road; in fact, it's how Tim Mousseau describes his first visit to Chernobyl. In 1999, this Professor of Biological Sciences from the University of South Carolina travelled to the site of the world's most horrific nuclear accident, alongside Professor Anders Møller, an ornithologist and evolutionary biologist from the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris. Their on-site research has sparked an intense controversy over the effects of radiation on humans and animals – one which they hope their latest trip into the fallout zone, which sets out in two weeks, will help to resolve.
In the wake of the accident, more than 300,000 people were evacuated and an 800 square mile exclusion zone created around the reactor. Yet recently it has been reported that the abandoned town of Pripyat has become a wildlife haven. There have been sightings of wolves, bears and moose wandering through the deserted streets, and swifts swoop round abandoned office blocks. The implication is that if wildlife can return so soon, nuclear radiation – and nuclear power – might be less dangerous than has been suggested. James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia theory, has even written that the natural world "would welcome nuclear waste as the perfect guardian against greedy developers… the preference of wildlife for nuclear-waste sites suggests that the best sites for its disposal are the tropical forests and other habitats in need of a reliable guardian against their destruction by hungry farmers and developers".
Click here for the rest.

2 comments:

  1. Lovelock is one sensible guy. There was a neighbourhood in the town that I grew up in that had leaky barrels of radioactive waste sitting outside on one property for many, many years. Nothing got done about it for so long because it was a sketchy neighbourhood, the lowest of the low. My old hometown has been developed like shit but the old radioactive neighbourhood has not changed much. There's wildlife there like you would not believe - bikers are attracted to radioactivity just like wolves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suspect that wildlife thrives in these areas simply because humans shun them.

    They may live shorter lives too.

    Perhaps it's the lack of other carcinogens in the area (car exhaust) that makes it "healthier"?

    ReplyDelete