Wednesday, December 05, 2012
NO GUNS, PLEASE, WE’RE JAPANESE
I have
always been morbidly fascinated by how the Japanese managed to conduct serious
warfare while spurning the use of firearms for more than two centuries because
they debased the nobility of combat.
"Alone among countries that
acquired and mastered guns, Japan effectively banned and repudiated these
weapons, while simultaneously cutting itself off from the outside world. This
meant that Japan was defenseless when U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry arrived with
gunships in 1853, a culturally shocking moment, which vaulted Japan into a
civil war caused, in part, by conflict between those who wanted Japan to
continue to hold to its traditions -- and those who wanted to rapidly modernize
Japan and catch up with the rest of the industrializing world:
"Warfare ensured that once states had acquired guns, they could not give them up. To this rule, there is one glaring exception: Japan. The Japanese first encountered firearms when Portuguese adventurers arrived in 1453 with two matchlocks, guns in which the powder was ignited with a match. Japanese blacksmiths quickly learned to produce such weapons in large quantities. The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries are known as the Age of the Country at War, when powerful lords battled for control of the country. At the Battle of Nagashino in 1575, an army of 38,000 men, of whom 10,000 carried guns, defeated an army of sword-wielding samurai (or Japanese knights). Japan soon had more guns than any European country. Warfare and the proliferation of guns had serious social consequences, however. The battles showed that even a poorly trained peasant with a gun could kill a samurai, no matter how courageous, well trained, or expensively armored he might be. This threatened the position of the warrior class, who numbered half a million and were jealous of their status and their privileges, such as the right to carry swords.
"Warfare ensured that once states had acquired guns, they could not give them up. To this rule, there is one glaring exception: Japan. The Japanese first encountered firearms when Portuguese adventurers arrived in 1453 with two matchlocks, guns in which the powder was ignited with a match. Japanese blacksmiths quickly learned to produce such weapons in large quantities. The fifteenth and sixteenth centuries are known as the Age of the Country at War, when powerful lords battled for control of the country. At the Battle of Nagashino in 1575, an army of 38,000 men, of whom 10,000 carried guns, defeated an army of sword-wielding samurai (or Japanese knights). Japan soon had more guns than any European country. Warfare and the proliferation of guns had serious social consequences, however. The battles showed that even a poorly trained peasant with a gun could kill a samurai, no matter how courageous, well trained, or expensively armored he might be. This threatened the position of the warrior class, who numbered half a million and were jealous of their status and their privileges, such as the right to carry swords.
In the
early seventeenth century, Tokugawa Ieyasu and his descendants defeated their
rivals and established a military dictatorship. In the 1630s, they began
restricting the manufacture and sale of firearms. Only in two towns could
gunmakers practice their trade. Civilians were forbidden to buy guns.
Gradually, the government cut back its orders of firearms; by 1673, it was
buying 53 large matchlocks or 334 small ones on alternate years. It also
expelled all foreigners and forbade Japanese people from traveling abroad
under penalty of death. For the next two centuries, no foreign power
threatened Japan. The country was practically cut off from contact with the
outside world and saw no reason to keep up with technological changes occurring
elsewhere. Guns were forgotten until 1853, when American warships arrived in
Tokyo Bay and, by firing their cannon, awoke Japan to the power of modern
technology.” – Daniel R. Headrick: Technology: A World History (Oxford University Press)
The secret
word is Loaded
Dave
Brubeck – RIP
Sunday, December 02, 2012
JUST 19 SHOPPING DAYS TO OBLIVION
My
relentless ego compels me to remind everyone how I was discussing The 2012
Solstice Doom Racket back when José Argüelles and Terence McKenna were the only major
players. Now even the mainstream media are not only in on the act, but shrieking like Helen
Lovejoy, “Will someone think of the children?” But don’t despair, whatever else
might come to pass on December 21st, The Deviants and their
ill-gotten cronies will be hosting a party in a pub in Brighton so we can all
cease to exist together. Details will be revealed as the plot thickens, but it
should not be confused with band’s full-on, no-prisoners rock & roll on
show in Lewes on December 14th. (See about three items down.)
“NASA scientists took time on Wednesday (Nov. 28) to soothe
2012 doomsday fears, warning against the dark side of Mayan apocalypse rumors —
frightened children and suicidal teens who truly fear the world may come to an
end Dec. 21. These fears are based on misinterpretations of the Mayan calendar. On the 21st, the date of the winter
solstice, a calendar cycle called the 13th b'ak'tun comes to an end. Although
Maya scholars agree that the ancient Maya would not have seen this day as
apocalyptic, rumors have spread that a cosmic event may end life on Earth on
that day. There is no true issue here," David Morrison, an astrobiologist
at NASA Ames Research Center said "This is just a manufactured fantasy.
“Unfortunately, Morrison said, the fantasy has real-life consequences. Morrison
receives many emails and letters from worried citizens, particularly young
people. Some say they can't eat, or are too worried to sleep, others say
they're suicidal.”
96% OF THE UNIVERSE IS MISSING
And even if
the great multidimensional, string-theory main switch is shut off, it still
seems we only know about 4% of the known universe.
“Astronomers and physicists
are now grappling with evidence that suggests, even with the most powerful
telescopes, we can only observe four percent of the universe. The rest, they
posit, is dark matter and dark energy: " 'Dark,' cosmologists call it, in
what could go down in history as the ultimate semantic surrender. This is not
'dark' as in distant or invisible. This is not "dark" as in black holes
or deep space. This is 'dark' as in unknown for now, and possibly forever: 23
percent something mysterious that they call dark matter, 73 percent something
even more mysterious that they call dark energy. Which leaves only 4 percent
the stuff of us. As one theorist likes to say at public lectures, 'We're just a
bit of pollution.' Get rid of us and of everything else we've ever thought of
as the universe, and very little would change. 'We're completely irrelevant,'
he adds, cheerfully.
"The 'ultimate Copernican revolution,' as [astronomers] often call it, is taking place right now. It's happening in underground mines, where ultrasensitive detectors wait for the ping of a hypothetical particle that might already have arrived or might never come, and it's happening in ivory towers, where coffee-break conversations conjure multiverses out of espresso steam. It's happening at the South Pole, where telescopes monitor the relic radiation from the Big Bang; in Stockholm, where Nobelists have already begun to receive recognition for their encounters with the dark side; on the laptops of postdocs around the world, as they observe the realtime self-annihilations of stars, billions of light-years distant, from the comfort of a living room couch. It's happening in healthy collaborations and, the universe being the intrinsically Darwinian place it is, in career-threatening competitions.
"The astronomers who have found themselves leading this revolution didn't set out to do so. Like Galileo, they had no reason to expect that they would discover new phenomena. They weren't looking for dark matter. They weren't looking for dark energy. And when they found the evidence for dark matter and dark energy, they didn't believe it. But as more and better evidence accumulated, they and their peers reached a consensus that the universe we thought we knew, for as long as civilization had been looking at the night sky, is only a shadow of what's out there.” – Richard Panek: The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality ( Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)
"The 'ultimate Copernican revolution,' as [astronomers] often call it, is taking place right now. It's happening in underground mines, where ultrasensitive detectors wait for the ping of a hypothetical particle that might already have arrived or might never come, and it's happening in ivory towers, where coffee-break conversations conjure multiverses out of espresso steam. It's happening at the South Pole, where telescopes monitor the relic radiation from the Big Bang; in Stockholm, where Nobelists have already begun to receive recognition for their encounters with the dark side; on the laptops of postdocs around the world, as they observe the realtime self-annihilations of stars, billions of light-years distant, from the comfort of a living room couch. It's happening in healthy collaborations and, the universe being the intrinsically Darwinian place it is, in career-threatening competitions.
"The astronomers who have found themselves leading this revolution didn't set out to do so. Like Galileo, they had no reason to expect that they would discover new phenomena. They weren't looking for dark matter. They weren't looking for dark energy. And when they found the evidence for dark matter and dark energy, they didn't believe it. But as more and better evidence accumulated, they and their peers reached a consensus that the universe we thought we knew, for as long as civilization had been looking at the night sky, is only a shadow of what's out there.” – Richard Panek: The 4 Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality ( Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)
Click here for Danse Society
